YourChild1st.com Scott Wasserman & Associates, LLC
Scott Wasserman & Associates, LLC
8889 Bourgade
Lenexa, KS 66219-1403
913/438-4636 Fax 913/438-4637

Home | Meet our Attorneys | Contact us | Map to our Office | Client Login 
Front Page 
 
 News
 Abuse and Neglect
 Adoption & Guardianship
 Child Custody
 Child Support
 General
 Grandparents' Rights
 Juvenile Justice
 Special Education
 
 Parenting
Search

News : Special Education Last Updated: Jul 19th, 2007 - 11:22:16


U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Rights of Parents of Students with Disabilities
By Scott Wasserman
May 23, 2007, 09:50

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

The United States Supreme Court on Monday issued a unanimous ruling upholding the rights of parents of students with disabilities. The case, known as Winkleman v. Parma City School District, held that parents have independent, enforceable rights under special education law. Those rights go beyond procedural and reimbursement related matters to encompass also the entitlement to a free, appropriate education for their child.

The dispute in this case arose when the parents of a child with autism spectrum disorder filed a lawsuit against their school district. Normally, only attorneys can represent other people in court. The school district successfully dismissed the lawsuit because, they said, the parents had no right to represent their child in court.

On appeal, the Supreme Court reversed that decision. The court said that the parents represent real parties in interest in special education cases. Therefore, they may appear in court to represent themselves, even if they would not be authorized to represent their children.

This ruling represents a victory for parents in many ways. The court reiterated many of the rights parents enjoy under special education law. According to the Supreme Court, parents play a "significant role" in the process of determining the special education for their children. Some of their rights include:

  • They must be included in the IEP team.

  • The concerns parents have for enhancing the education of their children must be considered by the team.

  • The IEP team must revise the IEP when appropriate to address certain information provided by the parents.

  • The education must be provided at no cost to the parents.

  • The parents must participate in the decision making process regarding the provision of a free appropriate education to their child.

  • They might be reimbursed for their attorney fees if they prevail in a due process hearing against the school.
    Back to home page

    www.yourchild1st.com


    Contact us


    The information on this site is only for general educational purposes, and not for legal advice. Laws change, and their application may vary significantly depending on your circumstances. If you need legal advice, you must consult an attorney.  The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.


    Copywright 2007 Scott Wasserman & Associates, LLC



Top of Page

Special Education
Latest Headlines
Audit Urges Coordination Of Programs For Young Children
Do Vaccines Cause Autism In Children?
Disabled Students Deserve Education in the Least Restrictive Environment
High Quality Child Care Prevents Depression
U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Rights of Parents of Students with Disabilities
Read and Talk With Young Children
Parents Tell Schools, "Don't Touch My Child."
Missouri Senate Considers Bill To Educate Children In Foster Care
How To Keep Disabled Kids In School
Scott Wasserman Speaks at Horizon Academy