YourChild1st.com Scott Wasserman & Associates, LLC
Scott Wasserman & Associates, LLC
8889 Bourgade
Lenexa, KS 66219-1403
913/438-4636 Fax 913/438-4637

Home | Meet our Attorneys | Contact us | Map to our Office | Client Login 
Front Page 
 
 News
 Abuse and Neglect
 Adoption & Guardianship
 Child Custody
 Child Support
 General
 Grandparents' Rights
 Juvenile Justice
 Special Education
 
 Parenting
Search

News : Child Custody Last Updated: Jul 19th, 2007 - 11:23:03


Who Gets the Kids?
By Scott Wasserman
May 16, 2007, 09:57

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

The father wants to share equal parenting time. The mother wants primary residential custody. She wants their children to live with her but spend every other weekend with their father.

Both parents believe they are being fair, rational, and good to their kids. If they can't reach an agreement among themselves, a court will decide for them.

So who gets the kids? We have argued this scenario from both sides, both for fathers and for mothers. We litigate from the specific facts in each family's situation.

Mothers often can show that they have been the primary care giver for the entire life of the children. This argument can be especially persuasive if the mother has stayed home with the children. Sometimes we put a spin on this argument by showing that the mother is the "detailed" parent or the "structured" parent. While the father's contributions are also important, the children can take advantage of both parents' strengths by living with their mother during the week and with their father every other weekend.

Fathers are appalled by this suggestion. When we represent fathers, we argue that children need a real father, not a visitor. The sundry details of every day life cannot be replaced: feeding, bathing, homework, and getting the children ready for bed. Even if this was not the father's primary responsibility during the marriage, many things will change after the marriage. Moreover, it is unfair to require the father to support the mother through spousal maintenance (alimony) and child support so that she can retain primary custody of the children.

In the end, we hope that parents can work out an arrangement among themselves without resorting to court. A judge has biases and prejudices like any other human. A court would make its decision based on a limited amount of evidence. It is impossible to guess in advance what little detail will trigger a response from the judge. Parents leaving family court often consider the results irrational and unfair.

No one loves your children as the parents do. We hope the parents can keep control over their own children without turning them over to the stranger in the black robe.

Back to home page

www.yourchild1st.com


Contact us


The information on this site is only for general educational purposes, and not for legal advice. Laws change, and their application may vary significantly depending on your circumstances. If you need legal advice, you must consult an attorney.  The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.


Copywright 2007 Scott Wasserman & Associates, LLC



Top of Page

Child Custody
Latest Headlines
Three Steps To Protect Your Children From Their Porn Addicted Parent
Insurers Deny Benefits for Mental Illness
Web Software Helps Coordinate Joint Custody
Who Gets the Kids?
Collaborative Divorce Saves Children
Does day care make children misbehave in school?
Name Changes In Kansas
Which State Will Hear Your Dispute Over Child Custody?
What You Must Know Before You Move Away With Your Child
You Never Know What Your Judge Might To Do